My blog has moved!

You should be automatically redirected in 6 seconds. If not, visit
http://www.loukrieger.com
and update your links and bookmarks.

Lou Krieger Poker Blog

Lou Krieger has come a long way in the poker world. Well known as the co-author of Poker for Dummies, Lou has also written 11 best-selling books and more than 400 columns and magazine articles of poker strategy, and is the editor of Poker Player Newspaper. Catch Lou’s views, opinions and commentary on just about everything in the world of poker. Join Lou every Thursday at 9:00 PM ET on www.roundersradio.com, where he hosts the webcast show, "Keep Flopping Aces."

Monday, November 13, 2006

Rep Leach's Political Epitaph

While the majority of poker players are fiercly independent, and many don'e even take the time to vote, that all seemed to change in last week's election. Long time Representative Jim Leach -- a 30-year member of the House of Representatives -- was removed from Congress power by Iowa voters Tuesday.

Leach was one of the driving forces who who came up with the plan to prevent banks and other financial channels from funding online gaming. This plan led to the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 (UIGEA).

It's ironic in a way, but during his re-election campaign, Leach called the Internet gambling legislation he originated one of his proudest accomplishments during his 30 years in Congress.

Now that proud accomplishment can serve as both a political epitaph for Leach himself as well as a reminder to other elected officials who want to pander to the religious right, that poker players are organized: We vote, and we're bound and determined to send packing any other legislator with plans to enact nanny-state legislation telling us what we can and can't do with our own money, on our own time, and in the privacy of our own homes.

1 Comments:

At 3:47 PM, Blogger Lynx56 said...

I've seen several people either imply or directly state that online gamblers were responsible for turning out Leach and others. In all the post-election analysis I've seen, though, nobody has mentioned online gamblers as a voting block, or online gambling as an important issue to voters.

I'd love to think this issue swayed a few votes, and in a 50-50 race it might have tilted the outcome. It seems more likely, though, that this issue (trampling on people's rights) was just one of many straws on the camel's back, and as such it's difficult to claim cause and effect.

I'm concerned that making claims about "poker power" (hey I coined a term) might breed complacency, and we're nowhere near strong enough to influence legislation yet. Harrah's, MGM, et al wield far more influence than we do, so let's not pat ourselves on the back just yet. We still have a long way to go.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home